WBAUnofficial

Full Version: Grosicki
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6
This is taking a while to decide what time the paperwork was lodged.  I read that his lawyers were on the case.  Could we have a Grosicki ruling similar to the Bosman ruling so clubs and players can buy and sell players when they want?  IMO the windows are bollocks and there to add “excitement”.  Managers can be sacked and brought in whenever so why not players? 

I personally hope the transfer windows are abolished.
Bosman.
(10-20-2020, 06:03 PM)Fulham Fallout Wrote: [ -> ]This is taking a while to decide what time the paperwork was lodged.  I read that his lawyers were on the case.  Could we have a Grosicki ruling similar to the Bowman ruling so clubs and players can by and sell players when they want?  IMO the windows are bollocks and there to add “excitement”.  Managers can be sacked and brought in whenever so why not players? 

I personally hope the transfer windows are abolished.

Think it would cause too much uncertainty FF and would give teams the opportunity to buy all kinds of scenarios.
(10-20-2020, 08:06 PM)Hopalong Wrote: [ -> ]
(10-20-2020, 06:03 PM)Fulham Fallout Wrote: [ -> ]This is taking a while to decide what time the paperwork was lodged.  I read that his lawyers were on the case.  Could we have a Grosicki ruling similar to the Bowman ruling so clubs and players can by and sell players when they want?  IMO the windows are bollocks and there to add “excitement”.  Managers can be sacked and brought in whenever so why not players? 

I personally hope the transfer windows are abolished.

Think it would cause too much uncertainty FF and would give teams the opportunity to buy all kinds of scenarios.

When you say scenarios,  do you mean like if a sloth had to choose between an apple, a banana or 15 hours hanging in a tree stoned out of its head it would choose 15 pints and a donner kebab?
Still no news.

How long does it take to look at the date/time an email was sent?!?!?
(10-22-2020, 07:44 AM)Fulham Fallout Wrote: [ -> ]Still no news.

How long does it take to look at the date/time an email was sent?!?!?

He probably doesn't want to go and would like to fight for a place here. Anyone thought of that.
(10-22-2020, 07:44 AM)Fulham Fallout Wrote: [ -> ]Still no news.

How long does it take to look at the date/time an email was sent?!?!?


That's really not the issue, they know the paperwork was 21 seconds late, the delay now is whether the Football league accept that there were extenuating circumstances.
(10-20-2020, 06:03 PM)Fulham Fallout Wrote: [ -> ]This is taking a while to decide what time the paperwork was lodged.  I read that his lawyers were on the case.  Could we have a Grosicki ruling similar to the Bosman ruling so clubs and players can buy and sell players when they want?  IMO the windows are bollocks and there to add “excitement”.  Managers can be sacked and brought in whenever so why not players? 

I personally hope the transfer windows are abolished.

We definitely need a window.

Gammon's cock needs time to recover in between them  Big Grin
(10-22-2020, 07:53 AM)Psalm23 Wrote: [ -> ]
(10-22-2020, 07:44 AM)Fulham Fallout Wrote: [ -> ]Still no news.

How long does it take to look at the date/time an email was sent?!?!?


That's really not the issue, they know the paperwork was 21 seconds late, the delay now is whether the Football league accept that there were extenuating circumstances.


<Waits for the football league to set a date for a hearing for the 4th Jan>
(10-22-2020, 07:53 AM)Psalm23 Wrote: [ -> ]
(10-22-2020, 07:44 AM)Fulham Fallout Wrote: [ -> ]Still no news.

How long does it take to look at the date/time an email was sent?!?!?


That's really not the issue, they know the paperwork was 21 seconds late, the delay now is whether the Football league accept that there were extenuating circumstances.

The issue is apparently the wording which is "must be completed by 17.30". It was completed at 17.30 and 21 seconds so the Forest lawyers are arguing that the time was still 17.30 until it ticks over until 31 minutes past, and therefore it was done in time.
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6