With possible offsides on certainly HRK's goal, mebbes Austins. The distance of our player from the free kick for the second, being called into question with the new ruling.
We could have all been absolutely fuming last night, rather than celebrating a great performance and big win.
Pointless question really I know, just pondering it all, and as the prophet of Don (Goodman) has said 'Fine Margins!'
Quite true but I also think VAR may have seen a foul in the shennanigans that led to their goal.
And also wouldn't have given HRK offside when he was clean through
Yeah, but HRK was played clean through in the second half at 2-0 only to be stopped by a lino's flag when he was clearly onside. If VAR had been in operation, the lino would be instructed to flag late and HRK would've been allowed to continue his run and probably scored. VAR would have given the goal. Their goal also looked dodgy to me - one of their players was clearly backing into one of ours to prevent him getting to the ball and this may well have been enough for it to be chalked off. Many of these calls are subjective and marginal whether made by the on-field ref initially or one of his mates miles away. It's why VAR is utter and complete bollocks.
Yeah very true re the offside wrongly given on HRK, that would have played out. Just shows the extent VAR can change a game I guess.
(11-28-2019, 05:23 PM)Tom Joad Wrote: [ -> ]Quite true but I also think VAR may have seen a foul in the shennanigans that led to their goal.
There were at least 2 of our players being held/pulled over.
(11-28-2019, 05:25 PM)steviedm Wrote: [ -> ]Yeah, but HRK was played clean through in the second half at 2-0 only to be stopped by a lino's flag when he was clearly onside. If VAR had been in operation, the lino would be instructed to flag late and HRK would've been allowed to continue his run and probably scored. VAR would have given the goal. Their goal also looked dodgy to me - one of their players was clearly backing into one of ours to prevent him getting to the ball and this may well have been enough for it to be chalked off. Many of these calls are subjective and marginal whether made by the on-field ref initially or one of his mates miles away. It's why VAR is utter and complete bollocks.
Very true. It will ruin the game completely.
(11-28-2019, 05:32 PM)col lard Wrote: [ -> ] (11-28-2019, 05:23 PM)Tom Joad Wrote: [ -> ]Quite true but I also think VAR may have seen a foul in the shennanigans that led to their goal.
There were at least 2 of our players being held/pulled over.
(11-28-2019, 05:25 PM)steviedm Wrote: [ -> ]Yeah, but HRK was played clean through in the second half at 2-0 only to be stopped by a lino's flag when he was clearly onside. If VAR had been in operation, the lino would be instructed to flag late and HRK would've been allowed to continue his run and probably scored. VAR would have given the goal. Their goal also looked dodgy to me - one of their players was clearly backing into one of ours to prevent him getting to the ball and this may well have been enough for it to be chalked off. Many of these calls are subjective and marginal whether made by the on-field ref initially or one of his mates miles away. It's why VAR is utter and complete bollocks.
Very true. It will ruin the game completely.
Bartley literally gets pulled to the floor, even at normal speed on the replay it's blatant.
Lets hope we keep getting the benefit of marginal decisions and worry about VAR next season .
Looked like a foul on Bartley for their goal.
(11-28-2019, 05:23 PM)Tom Joad Wrote: [ -> ]Quite true but I also think VAR may have seen a foul in the shennanigans that led to their goal.
Definitely, their CB held Bartley down.