WBAunofficial
The Dortmund bomb - Printable Version

+- WBAunofficial (http://www.wbaunofficial.org.uk)
+-- Forum: WBAunofficial (http://www.wbaunofficial.org.uk/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: WBAunofficial (http://www.wbaunofficial.org.uk/forumdisplay.php?fid=2)
+--- Thread: The Dortmund bomb (/showthread.php?tid=6518)

Pages: 1 2 3


The Dortmund bomb - Derek Hardballs - 04-21-2017

Looks like the person responsible did it for money and was a city trader not a terrorist.


RE: The Dortmund bomb - Birdman1811 - 04-21-2017

Well he's still a terrorist.


RE: The Dortmund bomb - Narcosis - 04-21-2017

Strange that news articles about this say it "wasn't a terrorist attack", when it's very clear no matter the motive that it was designed to cause terror.


RE: The Dortmund bomb - P_K - 04-21-2017

How is he not a terrorist?


RE: The Dortmund bomb - Baggie_Shrek - 04-21-2017

The definition of terrorism is: "the unlawful use of violence and intimidation, especially against civilians, in the pursuit of political aims."

Financial gain isn't terrorism. Otherwise every violent robbery would be a terrorist act.

What this does show is that we shouldn't jump to conclusions...


RE: The Dortmund bomb - wewerehereonce - 04-21-2017

(04-21-2017, 08:24 AM)P_K Wrote: How is he not a terrorist?

Because he didn't shout allahu akbar as the bomb went off . . .


RE: The Dortmund bomb - Fido - 04-21-2017

(04-21-2017, 08:47 AM)wewerehereonce Wrote:
(04-21-2017, 08:24 AM)P_K Wrote: How is he not a terrorist?

Because he didn't shout allahu akbar as the bomb went off . . .

These Hawaiians have got a lot to answer for, tellin yis.


RE: The Dortmund bomb - wewerehereonce - 04-21-2017

(04-21-2017, 08:53 AM)Fido Wrote:
(04-21-2017, 08:47 AM)wewerehereonce Wrote:
(04-21-2017, 08:24 AM)P_K Wrote: How is he not a terrorist?

Because he didn't shout allahu akbar as the bomb went off . . .

These Hawaiians have got a lot to answer for, tellin yis.

Arf!  Big Grin

FYI: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Takbir


RE: The Dortmund bomb - Derek Hardballs - 04-21-2017

(04-21-2017, 08:27 AM)Baggie_Shrek Wrote: The definition of terrorism is: "the unlawful use of violence and intimidation, especially against civilians, in the pursuit of political aims."

Financial gain isn't terrorism. Otherwise every violent robbery would be a terrorist act.

What this does show is that we shouldn't jump to conclusions...

Thank fug for that Shrek, I don't have add anything but thank you.


RE: The Dortmund bomb - Mancbaggie - 04-21-2017

(04-21-2017, 08:27 AM)Baggie_Shrek Wrote: The definition of terrorism is: "the unlawful use of violence and intimidation, especially against civilians, in the pursuit of political aims."

Financial gain isn't terrorism. Otherwise every violent robbery would be a terrorist act.

What this does show is that we shouldn't jump to conclusions...

Spot on

Can only assume the bogus letter was written by Josh