11-12-2020, 08:47 AM
(11-12-2020, 07:33 AM)billybassett Wrote: Here's one for you Deko
https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationa...tember2020
You think you're saving lives banging the everyone must be saved at all costs drum. You're probably actually killing more of them just slowly
Also extending my post re the army tests yesterday the govt has published:
https://www.gov.uk/government/news/oxfor...=immediate
220 positive from 44k tests. False positive rate 0.36% positives rate 0.5%
So even though nobody actually responded to the info I put about this yesterday this is again a damning verdict once more in the sense that there are no positives in that batch of tests and the PCR test that is giving 2.5% positives is producing mainly false positives as I've been saying for months.
If the projections of cases and admissions was based on this data rather than what Sage would like with the PCR (so they can sell their tests and make money from a vaccine ) we'd now be living our lives normally and not.killing ourselves slowly.
But to do that of course would mean politicians and sage admitting they are wrong. I'd be better off searching for hens teeth rather than waiting for that.
I expect no response but you should really be writing to your mp about this fraud.
(11-11-2020, 04:44 PM)baggy1 Wrote: Possibly SM - if that's the case it isn't excess deaths and that's what I think Billy is getting confused over. To get a real understanding it has to be like for like.
I'm not confused about what excess deaths are. Seems like I'm the only one on here not confused by the PCR test invalidity though.
So you want to base predictions on cases and admissions on testing asymptomatic people, not people who actually have symptoms or even on real life cases, admissions and ICU occupancy. Nuts