11-26-2020, 09:26 AM
Here you go Billy, this bloke appears to know a bit about immunology and he has some good points that answer your questions that you have cut and paste from twitter. He makes some good points about how Mike Yeadon is possibly wrong, dare I say even on the 0.1% false positive theory for PCR testing that you bring up now and again (spoiler alert, it was never 0.1% false positives - the number was so small for false positive that they couldn't measure it so that described it as less than 0.1%, this got translated by, dare I say, people that wanted to misinterpret that fact as 0.1%.)
https://twitter.com/andrew_croxford
You might be better off reading his views rather than asking retirees and accountants on a football message board.
So lets see:
Excess deaths being the same as the worst year we've had recently 'adjusted for population growth' - Wrong
Massive increase in people being referred to NHS Mental Health services - Incorrect
Excess deaths not being in the same areas as where the virus is - Nope
And now, PCR testing has 0.1% false positive - Don't look like it
I'll leave you to research your theories with Mr.Croxford, I'll just stick to those boring old facts and sheeple along.
https://twitter.com/andrew_croxford
You might be better off reading his views rather than asking retirees and accountants on a football message board.
So lets see:
Excess deaths being the same as the worst year we've had recently 'adjusted for population growth' - Wrong
Massive increase in people being referred to NHS Mental Health services - Incorrect
Excess deaths not being in the same areas as where the virus is - Nope
And now, PCR testing has 0.1% false positive - Don't look like it
I'll leave you to research your theories with Mr.Croxford, I'll just stick to those boring old facts and sheeple along.