12-08-2020, 02:06 PM
(12-08-2020, 12:48 PM)baggy1 Wrote: So basically you are saying that there was an estimate made that didn't occur, and the rising number of hospitalisations and deaths that did occur don't mean anything. And you wonder why your point about leaving it up to the common sense of the public is what we should do is questioned.
No, I'm *basically* saying that the statistical basis for the second lockdown was flawed. As was the statistical basis for the first lockdown.
We're being terrified into submission by stats, which then turn out to be wildy inaccurate.