The license fee
Going back to the fee itself. If banks sell products to customers that do not require them, they would be forced to repay what the customers had paid them due to mis-selling a product This is the same as someone having to pay the BBC when they only want to watch sky
Reply
(02-11-2021, 12:45 PM)Fulham Fallout Wrote: Going back to the fee itself.  If banks sell products to customers that do not require them, they would be forced to repay what the customers had paid them due to mis-selling a product  This is the same as someone having to pay the BBC when they only want to watch sky

Or ITV or Channel 5 or Yesterday etc.
Reply
(02-11-2021, 12:45 PM)Fulham Fallout Wrote: Going back to the fee itself.  If banks sell products to customers that do not require them, they would be forced to repay what the customers had paid them due to mis-selling a product  This is the same as someone having to pay the BBC when they only want to watch sky

It really, really isn’t the same at all.
Reply
(02-11-2021, 12:45 PM)Fulham Fallout Wrote: Going back to the fee itself.  If banks sell products to customers that do not require them, they would be forced to repay what the customers had paid them due to mis-selling a product  This is the same as someone having to pay the BBC when they only want to watch sky

By the same logic childless people could argue they should pay less tax as they don’t need schools...

Doesn’t work that way.

(02-11-2021, 07:10 PM)backsidebaggie Wrote:
(02-11-2021, 07:06 PM)Duffers Wrote:
(02-11-2021, 12:45 PM)Fulham Fallout Wrote: Going back to the fee itself.  If banks sell products to customers that do not require them, they would be forced to repay what the customers had paid them due to mis-selling a product  This is the same as someone having to pay the BBC when they only want to watch sky

By the same logic childless people could argue they should pay less tax as they don’t need schools...

Doesn’t work that way.

Nah. Society can’t function without schools. It can function with adverts on the bbc.

Not during Dr Who it can’t!
Reply
(02-11-2021, 07:06 PM)Duffers Wrote:
(02-11-2021, 12:45 PM)Fulham Fallout Wrote: Going back to the fee itself.  If banks sell products to customers that do not require them, they would be forced to repay what the customers had paid them due to mis-selling a product  This is the same as someone having to pay the BBC when they only want to watch sky

By the same logic childless people could argue they should pay less tax as they don’t need schools...

Doesn’t work that way.

Nah. Society can’t function without schools. It can function with adverts on the bbc.
Reply
(02-11-2021, 07:06 PM)Duffers Wrote:
(02-11-2021, 12:45 PM)Fulham Fallout Wrote: Going back to the fee itself.  If banks sell products to customers that do not require them, they would be forced to repay what the customers had paid them due to mis-selling a product  This is the same as someone having to pay the BBC when they only want to watch sky

By the same logic childless people could argue they should pay less tax as they don’t need schools...

Doesn’t work that way.

(02-11-2021, 07:10 PM)backsidebaggie Wrote:
(02-11-2021, 07:06 PM)Duffers Wrote:
(02-11-2021, 12:45 PM)Fulham Fallout Wrote: Going back to the fee itself.  If banks sell products to customers that do not require them, they would be forced to repay what the customers had paid them due to mis-selling a product  This is the same as someone having to pay the BBC when they only want to watch sky

By the same logic childless people could argue they should pay less tax as they don’t need schools...

Doesn’t work that way.

Nah. Society can’t function without schools. It can function with adverts on the bbc.

Not during Dr Who it can’t!

Another thread another argument I know but what a sham that show has become. Dreadful. Great actors but it's awful.


I hear the next episode is going to be called: Doctor Who and it's okay to be a young white male.
Reply
It's Doctor Who not Doctor Womb
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)