FFP Points deductions
#31
Villa seem confident they have it all under control. 

We await the outcome.
Reply
#32
Wheather any clubs are guilty of breaching any FFP laws , iv'e no confidence in the EFL in punishing any one .All it will do is encourage more clubs to take the piss .One things for certain we will never be under the microscope with our tight fisted owner .
Reply
#33
Doesn't seem like that's a meeting with any immediate influence on the imposition of sanctions though. When are they actually supposed to be imposed? Surely leaving it a bit late now.
Reply
#34
(04-24-2019, 04:52 AM)Three Degrees Wrote: Wheather any clubs are guilty of breaching any FFP laws , iv'e no confidence in the EFL in punishing any one .All it will do is encourage more clubs to take the piss .One things for certain we will never be under the microscope with our tight fisted owner .
So you would like us to break the rules, go heavily into debt, do a Leeds or Portsmouth, go bust or fret for months over whether we will be deducted points due to breaking FFP rules?

For “tight fisted” substitute prudent.
Reply
#35
(04-23-2019, 11:21 PM)Statto Wrote:
(04-23-2019, 03:07 PM)Only one real Albion Wrote: All interesting stuff but why is this not anywhere in the mainstream media.

Telegraph

So the clubs are meeting without the EFL!
Reply
#36
(04-24-2019, 06:37 AM)Kit Kat Chunky Wrote:
(04-23-2019, 11:21 PM)Statto Wrote:
(04-23-2019, 03:07 PM)Only one real Albion Wrote: All interesting stuff but why is this not anywhere in the mainstream media.

Telegraph

So the clubs are meeting without the EFL!

Just what I was thinking. They are not going and it sounds like Gibson is running the show and has an issue with Villa, Sheff Weds and Derby and not the EFL.
Reply
#37
(04-24-2019, 06:29 AM)John Osborne’s Knuckle Wrote:
(04-24-2019, 04:52 AM)Three Degrees Wrote: Wheather any clubs are guilty of breaching any FFP laws , iv'e no confidence in the EFL in punishing any one .All it will do is encourage more clubs to take the piss .One things for certain we will never be under the microscope with our tight fisted owner .
So you would like us to break the rules, go heavily into debt, do a Leeds or Portsmouth, go bust or fret for months over whether we will be deducted points due to breaking FFP rules?

For “tight fisted” substitute prudent.
We will never know if anyone as broken the rules until they make  a example of someone .lf no club as breached the rules then leave them be  but when chairman of clubs are insisting investigations take place then there must be evidence to suggest clubs have ,   lf they have broken regulations they should be punished .If they dont then why shouldnt we do the same ?
Reply
#38
(04-24-2019, 06:49 AM)Three Degrees Wrote:
(04-24-2019, 06:29 AM)John Osborne’s Knuckle Wrote:
(04-24-2019, 04:52 AM)Three Degrees Wrote: Wheather any clubs are guilty of breaching any FFP laws , iv'e no confidence in the EFL in punishing any one .All it will do is encourage more clubs to take the piss .One things for certain we will never be under the microscope with our tight fisted owner .
So you would like us to break the rules, go heavily into debt, do a Leeds or Portsmouth, go bust or fret for months over whether we will be deducted points due to breaking FFP rules?

For “tight fisted” substitute prudent.
We will never know if anyone as broken the rules until they make  a example of someone .lf no club as breached the rules then leave them be  but when chairman of clubs are insisting investigations take place then there must be evidence to suggest clubs have ,   lf they have broken regulations they should be punished .If they dont then why shouldnt we do the same ?

Because Lai made it clear from day 1 that he wouldn't invest any more cash
Reply
#39
(04-24-2019, 07:08 AM)Kit Kat Chunky Wrote:
(04-24-2019, 06:49 AM)Three Degrees Wrote:
(04-24-2019, 06:29 AM)John Osborne’s Knuckle Wrote:
(04-24-2019, 04:52 AM)Three Degrees Wrote: Wheather any clubs are guilty of breaching any FFP laws , iv'e no confidence in the EFL in punishing any one .All it will do is encourage more clubs to take the piss .One things for certain we will never be under the microscope with our tight fisted owner .
So you would like us to break the rules, go heavily into debt, do a Leeds or Portsmouth, go bust or fret for months over whether we will be deducted points due to breaking FFP rules?

For “tight fisted” substitute prudent.
We will never know if anyone as broken the rules until they make  a example of someone .lf no club as breached the rules then leave them be  but when chairman of clubs are insisting investigations take place then there must be evidence to suggest clubs have ,   lf they have broken regulations they should be punished .If they dont then why shouldnt we do the same ?

Because Lai made it clear from day 1 that he wouldn't invest any more cash
Fair enough but if we were brought by someone else tomorrow we probably wouldnt have the balls to do what some clubs are being accused off , thats my point .
Reply
#40
(04-24-2019, 07:13 AM)Three Degrees Wrote:
(04-24-2019, 07:08 AM)Kit Kat Chunky Wrote:
(04-24-2019, 06:49 AM)Three Degrees Wrote:
(04-24-2019, 06:29 AM)John Osborne’s Knuckle Wrote:
(04-24-2019, 04:52 AM)Three Degrees Wrote: Wheather any clubs are guilty of breaching any FFP laws , iv'e no confidence in the EFL in punishing any one .All it will do is encourage more clubs to take the piss .One things for certain we will never be under the microscope with our tight fisted owner .
So you would like us to break the rules, go heavily into debt, do a Leeds or Portsmouth, go bust or fret for months over whether we will be deducted points due to breaking FFP rules?

For “tight fisted” substitute prudent.
We will never know if anyone as broken the rules until they make  a example of someone .lf no club as breached the rules then leave them be  but when chairman of clubs are insisting investigations take place then there must be evidence to suggest clubs have ,   lf they have broken regulations they should be punished .If they dont then why shouldnt we do the same ?

Because Lai made it clear from day 1 that he wouldn't invest any more cash
Fair enough but if we were brought by someone else tomorrow we probably wouldnt have the balls to do what some clubs are being accused off , thats my point .
Only if the running of the club changed massively.

Jenkins wouldn't be a party to it. We need promotion and then Lai to sell. A tall order, for sure
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)