10-31-2019, 08:32 AM
I'm guessing it doesn't help that because he was caught doing something illegal, his wages won't be covered by the clubs insurance.
Richard Keogh - Sacked
|
10-31-2019, 08:32 AM
I'm guessing it doesn't help that because he was caught doing something illegal, his wages won't be covered by the clubs insurance.
10-31-2019, 08:53 AM
(10-31-2019, 07:50 AM)Peachy Wrote:(10-30-2019, 10:55 PM)Spandaubaggie Wrote: It’s a crap situation for all clubs involved in such shenanigans. Sure Derby have done their homework and will be interesting to hear what the full picture is. If he was the only person in the car then everyone would accept the sacking. However there were two others in the car and they have not been treated in the same way. If there aren't additional details that we don't know about then it is a clear case of discrimination and Derby are in trouble. There must be more to this.
10-31-2019, 12:18 PM
Considering the amount of money these clubs turn over, and the astronomic wages they pay to bang average players it always shocks me just how poor some of their legal advice seems to be.
Granted there's more speculation than anything else on this thread, but if they've offered an injured player a massive cut and then sacked him saying it's due to ill-discipline but not punished the other parties (who some may say are more guilty than Keogh), to the same degree I can't believe someone in their legal team hasn't said "you may need to have a bit of a think about this Mr Morris..."
10-31-2019, 12:54 PM
(10-31-2019, 12:18 PM)SW4Baggie Wrote: Considering the amount of money these clubs turn over, and the astronomic wages they pay to bang average players it always shocks me just how poor some of their legal advice seems to be. The other two have criminal convictions over the incident, and Keogh doesn't. Go figure!!
10-31-2019, 01:26 PM
Has anyone mentioned that there is a big difference between employing someone who can still do the job they are contracted to do .. the 2 convicted, and someone who cannot do the job for at least a year?.. I'm fairly certain had the two convicted been (rightly) jailed for a length of time, they too, like Keogh would have been sacked.
10-31-2019, 02:16 PM
(This post was last modified: 10-31-2019, 02:28 PM by HawkingsHalfpint.)
(10-30-2019, 10:06 PM)Lightnin Wrote:(10-30-2019, 09:55 PM)sickParrot Wrote: Allegedly the one who failed a class a drug test is the one to get fired, not sure if true but puts a different slant on it. If he had less than 2 grams on him then he'll get off with a caution, which is probably what has happened. Maybe he went out with Keith Vaz.
10-31-2019, 02:25 PM
(This post was last modified: 10-31-2019, 02:25 PM by Dreamkiller.)
(10-31-2019, 01:26 PM)yeoman lai Wrote: Has anyone mentioned that there is a big difference between employing someone who can still do the job they are contracted to do .. the 2 convicted, and someone who cannot do the job for at least a year?.. I'm fairly certain had the two convicted been (rightly) jailed for a length of time, they too, like Keogh would have been sacked. I'm thinking that Keogh could potentially make an insurance claim against the driver of the car he was in. From an insurance point of view, Keogh would be seen as the innocent victim, which also makes Derby's actions a bit iffy.
10-31-2019, 02:31 PM
(This post was last modified: 10-31-2019, 02:32 PM by Idiodyssey.)
(10-31-2019, 02:25 PM)Dreamkiller Wrote:(10-31-2019, 01:26 PM)yeoman lai Wrote: Has anyone mentioned that there is a big difference between employing someone who can still do the job they are contracted to do .. the 2 convicted, and someone who cannot do the job for at least a year?.. I'm fairly certain had the two convicted been (rightly) jailed for a length of time, they too, like Keogh would have been sacked. Interesting speculation elsewhere that his wages count against ffp but a legal settlement of his wages wouldn’t
10-31-2019, 02:49 PM
(10-31-2019, 02:31 PM)Idiodyssey Wrote:(10-31-2019, 02:25 PM)Dreamkiller Wrote:(10-31-2019, 01:26 PM)yeoman lai Wrote: Has anyone mentioned that there is a big difference between employing someone who can still do the job they are contracted to do .. the 2 convicted, and someone who cannot do the job for at least a year?.. I'm fairly certain had the two convicted been (rightly) jailed for a length of time, they too, like Keogh would have been sacked. would explain why they were keen to get him off the wage bill since he's one of their top earners at £30k/wk
10-31-2019, 04:26 PM
Maybe it's all been set up to achieve this end... get them other two to get him drunk and do stupid things... stranger things have happened!
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|