Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Corbyn calls for the requisition of empty houses
#1
To house the homeless from Grenfell Tower. David Lammy supports him

Let's start with Corbyn's house, which is too big for his family unit, and David Lammy's second home which we pay for (if he's still got it). 

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-40285994
Reply
#2
Oh, just go away.
Reply
#3
Opening up a can of worms here.

There's a genuine housing shortage but both Corbyn and Lammy have been in favour of uncontrolled migration over the years.
Reply
#4
Other board please.
Reply
#5
(06-16-2017, 07:46 AM)Mandown_Pilt Wrote: To house the homeless from Grenfell Tower. David Lammy supports him

Let's start with Corbyn's house, which is too big for his family unit, and David Lammy's second home which we pay for (if he's still got it). 

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-40285994

I'm with Liz Windsor when she praised the "incredible generosity" from her 775 room social housing unit.
Reply
#6
(06-16-2017, 07:46 AM)Mandown_Pilt Wrote: To house the homeless from Grenfell Tower. David Lammy supports him

Let's start with Corbyn's house, which is too big for his family unit, and David Lammy's second home which we pay for (if he's still got it). 

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-40285994

Are we allowed to politicise this tragedy now?
Reply
#7
The idea that you can separate politics from this tradegy is nonsense. The building is owned by the council, the safety measures were approved / allowed by legislation governments have passed despite warnings to the contrary. How arrogant is it if onlookers to tell others it's not the time to make it political when the residents themselves see this situation as a political issue! Empty words of sympathy are no better than angry words of dismay.

(06-16-2017, 08:42 AM)Baggie_Shrek Wrote:
(06-16-2017, 07:46 AM)Mandown_Pilt Wrote: To house the homeless from Grenfell Tower. David Lammy supports him

Let's start with Corbyn's house, which is too big for his family unit, and David Lammy's second home which we pay for (if he's still got it). 

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-40285994

Are we allowed to politicise this tragedy now?

Only now MDP has found an angle he thinks is relevant and in the 'right' side of the argument.
Reply
#8
(06-16-2017, 08:14 AM)Montserratbaggie Wrote:
(06-16-2017, 07:46 AM)Mandown_Pilt Wrote: To house the homeless from Grenfell Tower. David Lammy supports him

Let's start with Corbyn's house, which is too big for his family unit, and David Lammy's second home which we pay for (if he's still got it). 

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-40285994

I'm with Liz Windsor when she praised the "incredible generosity" from her 775 room social housing unit.

Spot on Montserat. +1
Reply
#9
(06-16-2017, 07:53 AM)Old Stroller Wrote: Oh, just go away.

Not happy about the hypocrisy of your left-wing heroes being shown up?

Fool.

You also don't have to read anything I write on here. I hope this helps.

(06-16-2017, 09:25 AM)Derek Hardballs Wrote: The idea that you can separate politics from this tradegy is nonsense. The building is owned by the council, the safety measures were approved / allowed by legislation governments have passed despite warnings to the contrary. How arrogant is it if onlookers to tell others it's not the time to make it political when the residents themselves see this situation as a political issue! Empty words of sympathy are no better than angry words of dismay.

(06-16-2017, 08:42 AM)Baggie_Shrek Wrote:
(06-16-2017, 07:46 AM)Mandown_Pilt Wrote: To house the homeless from Grenfell Tower. David Lammy supports him

Let's start with Corbyn's house, which is too big for his family unit, and David Lammy's second home which we pay for (if he's still got it). 

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-40285994

Are we allowed to politicise this tragedy now?

Only now MDP has found an angle he thinks is relevant and in the 'right' side of the argument.

Seems Derek is also too thick to understand that attacking people for politicising this, and using it to implement your socialist property sequestration ideals, is not politicking.

(06-16-2017, 07:58 AM)Duffmon Wrote: Other board please.

Shit, I thought I had put it in politics. Sorry, mods.
Reply
#10
(06-16-2017, 09:56 AM)Mandown_Pilt Wrote:
(06-16-2017, 07:53 AM)Old Stroller Wrote: Oh, just go away.

Not happy about the hypocrisy of your left-wing heroes being shown up?

Fool.

You also don't have to read anything I write on here. I hope this helps.

(06-16-2017, 09:25 AM)Derek Hardballs Wrote: The idea that you can separate politics from this tradegy is nonsense. The building is owned by the council, the safety measures were approved / allowed by legislation governments have passed despite warnings to the contrary. How arrogant is it if onlookers to tell others it's not the time to make it political when the residents themselves see this situation as a political issue! Empty words of sympathy are no better than angry words of dismay.

(06-16-2017, 08:42 AM)Baggie_Shrek Wrote:
(06-16-2017, 07:46 AM)Mandown_Pilt Wrote: To house the homeless from Grenfell Tower. David Lammy supports him

Let's start with Corbyn's house, which is too big for his family unit, and David Lammy's second home which we pay for (if he's still got it). 

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-40285994

Are we allowed to politicise this tragedy now?

Only now MDP has found an angle he thinks is relevant and in the 'right' side of the argument.

Seems Derek is also too thick to understand that attacking people for politicising this, and using it to implement your socialist property sequestration ideals, is not politicking.

(06-16-2017, 07:58 AM)Duffmon Wrote: Other board please.

Shit, I thought I had put it in politics. Sorry, mods.

Same old insults MDP.
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)