08-08-2019, 07:57 PM
(08-08-2019, 07:50 PM)WWHO Wrote:(08-08-2019, 07:30 PM)Super_Slav Wrote:(08-08-2019, 07:24 PM)Duffers Wrote:(08-08-2019, 07:24 PM)Super_Slav Wrote:(08-08-2019, 07:13 PM)clem4england Wrote: Charlie Austin suits our system better IMO.
Problem with Charlie is pace
That’s why we have all the others.
Fair point.
Kane isn’t that quick but has players around him that are very quick
Another thing to consider is that a player who has never relied on pace will continue to have an impact in his twilight years. Contrast Austin to Gayle, whose game relies on speed. I'd sooner had a 31/2-year-old Austin than a 31/2-year-old Gayle.
Austin will never outpace defenders or dribble past 2 or 3 of em but create chances for him in the box and he will be lethal.