WBAUnofficial › WBAUnofficial › WBAUnofficial v
Nathan Ferguson

Thread Modes
Nathan Ferguson
wba13 Offline
Posting Freak
*****
Posts: 4,790
Threads: 313
Joined: Jan 2019
Reputation: 9
#131
01-29-2020, 02:41 PM
Yes this is what is being reported . https://t.co/ckvcMa0AVx
Find
Reply
Ampadu's Left Boot Offline
Banned
Posts: 872
Threads: 9
Joined: Aug 2019
#132
01-29-2020, 02:53 PM
Best outcome for all, he didn't want to sign so let him move on and we get a fee. I expect a couple more in now over the next few days.

I can't believe the decision to play him last night was 'tactical' though. It was baffling to see him on the team-sheet, and in the light of this it just looks even more bizarre. I've absolutely no idea what the reason could be, but his inclusion must have had something to do with the dealings going on behind the scenes.
Find
Reply
Pragmatist Offline
Posting Freak
*****
Posts: 2,849
Threads: 149
Joined: Jan 2019
Reputation: 8
#133
01-29-2020, 03:01 PM
(01-29-2020, 02:53 PM)Ampadu\s Left Boot Wrote: Best outcome for all, he didn't want to sign so let him move on and we get a fee. I expect a couple more in now over the next few days.

I can't believe the decision to play him last night was 'tactical' though. It was baffling to see him on the team-sheet, and in the light of this it just looks even more bizarre. I've absolutely no idea what the reason could be, but his inclusion must have had something to do with the dealings going on behind the scenes.

I think Palace were negotiating the sale of Van Aarnholt last night and needed that to progress before signing Ferguson
Find
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)